P.V.J.J. URF SUCHITPUR ROOM NO.1 PS 3
GYANENDRA SINGH
BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY468 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNABHAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GYANENDRA SINGH | BJP | 468 | 70.38% | |
| 2 | KRISHNABHAN | SP | 106 | 15.94% | |
| 3 | OMPRAKASH CHAURASIA | BSP | 43 | 6.47% | |
| 4 | SHARDENDU KUMAR PANDEY | INC | 16 | 2.41% | |
| 5 | AWDHESH SINGH SAITHWAR | AAP | 10 | 1.50% | |
| 6 | PRAFULL | IND | 5 | 0.75% | |
| 7 | PRAVEEN | IND | 5 | 0.75% | |
| 8 | HARINARAYAN | IND | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 9 | SHATRUDHAN SINGH NISHAD | ASP | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 10 | SURESH CHAND | BASP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 11 | AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI | IND | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 12 | CHHEDI MAJDOOR | IND | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 13 | SHAMSHAD AALAM | AIMEI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | RAMCHANDRA | AJPI | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 665 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 468 | 70.38% | 1 | 31 | Strong |
| SP | 106 | 15.94% | 2 | 310 | Weak |
| BSP | 43 | 6.47% | 3 | 274 | Poor |
| IND | 17 | 2.56% | 4 | 63 | Poor |
| INC | 16 | 2.41% | 5 | 25 | Poor |
| AAP | 10 | 1.50% | 6 | 9 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.45% | 7 | 40 | Poor |
| BASP | 2 | 0.30% | 8 | 21 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 326 | Poor |
| AJPI | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 198 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 319, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.