P.V. MUHAMMADPUR ROOM NO.1 PS 277
GYANENDRA SINGH
BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY322 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNABHAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GYANENDRA SINGH | BJP | 322 | 53.85% | |
| 2 | KRISHNABHAN | SP | 223 | 37.29% | |
| 3 | OMPRAKASH CHAURASIA | BSP | 28 | 4.68% | |
| 4 | HARINARAYAN | IND | 7 | 1.17% | |
| 5 | SHARDENDU KUMAR PANDEY | INC | 5 | 0.84% | |
| 6 | PRAVEEN | IND | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 7 | AWDHESH SINGH SAITHWAR | AAP | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 8 | SHAMSHAD AALAM | AIMEI | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 9 | SURESH CHAND | BASP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 10 | AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | CHHEDI MAJDOOR | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 12 | PRAFULL | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 13 | RAMCHANDRA | AJPI | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 14 | SHATRUDHAN SINGH NISHAD | ASP | 1 | 0.17% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 598 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 322 | 53.85% | 1 | 183 | Strong |
| SP | 223 | 37.29% | 2 | 88 | Average |
| BSP | 28 | 4.68% | 3 | 334 | Poor |
| IND | 13 | 2.17% | 4 | 104 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 0.84% | 5 | 242 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 2 | 0.33% | 7 | 201 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.33% | 6 | 285 | Poor |
| AJPI | 1 | 0.17% | 8 | 137 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 191 | Poor |
| BASP | 1 | 0.17% | 10 | 148 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 319, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.