P.V. MOHANAPUR ROOM NO.1 PS 254
GYANENDRA SINGH
BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY211 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNABHAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GYANENDRA SINGH | BJP | 211 | 42.54% | |
| 2 | KRISHNABHAN | SP | 146 | 29.44% | |
| 3 | OMPRAKASH CHAURASIA | BSP | 119 | 23.99% | |
| 4 | SHARDENDU KUMAR PANDEY | INC | 6 | 1.21% | |
| 5 | HARINARAYAN | IND | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 6 | AWDHESH SINGH SAITHWAR | AAP | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 7 | SURESH CHAND | BASP | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 8 | AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI | IND | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 9 | CHHEDI MAJDOOR | IND | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 10 | PRAFULL | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 11 | RAMCHANDRA | AJPI | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 12 | SHATRUDHAN SINGH NISHAD | ASP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 13 | SHAMSHAD AALAM | AIMEI | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 14 | PRAVEEN | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 496 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 211 | 42.54% | 1 | 340 | Strong |
| SP | 146 | 29.44% | 2 | 208 | Average |
| BSP | 119 | 23.99% | 3 | 99 | Weak |
| IND | 7 | 1.41% | 4 | 272 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 1.21% | 5 | 188 | Poor |
| BASP | 2 | 0.40% | 7 | 42 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.40% | 6 | 279 | Poor |
| AJPI | 1 | 0.20% | 8 | 131 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.20% | 9 | 181 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 1 | 0.20% | 10 | 284 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 319, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.