P.V. RAJPUR ROOM NO.2 PS 231
GYANENDRA SINGH
BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY248 votes at this polling station
over OMPRAKASH CHAURASIA (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GYANENDRA SINGH | BJP | 248 | 57.14% | |
| 2 | OMPRAKASH CHAURASIA | BSP | 99 | 22.81% | |
| 3 | KRISHNABHAN | SP | 73 | 16.82% | |
| 4 | HARINARAYAN | IND | 5 | 1.15% | |
| 5 | AWDHESH SINGH SAITHWAR | AAP | 4 | 0.92% | |
| 6 | RAMCHANDRA | AJPI | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 7 | SHAMSHAD AALAM | AIMEI | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 8 | CHHEDI MAJDOOR | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 9 | PRAFULL | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 10 | PRAVEEN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | SURESH CHAND | BASP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | SHARDENDU KUMAR PANDEY | INC | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | SHATRUDHAN SINGH NISHAD | ASP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 434 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 248 | 57.14% | 1 | 296 | Strong |
| BSP | 99 | 22.81% | 2 | 144 | Weak |
| SP | 73 | 16.82% | 3 | 389 | Weak |
| IND | 7 | 1.61% | 4 | 269 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.92% | 5 | 154 | Poor |
| AJPI | 2 | 0.46% | 6 | 34 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 1 | 0.23% | 7 | 278 | Poor |
| INC | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 470 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 352 | Poor |
| BASP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 326 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 319, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.