B.J.H.S. NATWA ROOM NO.2 PS 224
GYANENDRA SINGH
BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY226 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNABHAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GYANENDRA SINGH | BJP | 226 | 53.43% | |
| 2 | KRISHNABHAN | SP | 107 | 25.30% | |
| 3 | OMPRAKASH CHAURASIA | BSP | 77 | 18.20% | |
| 4 | SHARDENDU KUMAR PANDEY | INC | 5 | 1.18% | |
| 5 | HARINARAYAN | IND | 4 | 0.95% | |
| 6 | AWDHESH SINGH SAITHWAR | AAP | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 7 | SURESH CHAND | BASP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 8 | PRAFULL | IND | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 9 | PRAVEEN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | CHHEDI MAJDOOR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | RAMCHANDRA | AJPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | SHATRUDHAN SINGH NISHAD | ASP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | SHAMSHAD AALAM | AIMEI | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 423 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 226 | 53.43% | 1 | 318 | Strong |
| SP | 107 | 25.30% | 2 | 309 | Average |
| BSP | 77 | 18.20% | 3 | 190 | Weak |
| IND | 5 | 1.18% | 4 | 339 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 1.18% | 5 | 236 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.47% | 6 | 274 | Poor |
| BASP | 1 | 0.24% | 7 | 130 | Poor |
| AJPI | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 329 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 349 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 401 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 319, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.