P.V. MIRZAPUR PAKARI ROOM NO.3 PS 201
KRISHNABHAN
SPSAMAJWADI PARTY338 votes at this polling station
over OMPRAKASH CHAURASIA (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNABHAN | SP | 338 | 63.65% | |
| 2 | OMPRAKASH CHAURASIA | BSP | 100 | 18.83% | |
| 3 | GYANENDRA SINGH | BJP | 73 | 13.75% | |
| 4 | SHAMSHAD AALAM | AIMEI | 12 | 2.26% | |
| 5 | SHARDENDU KUMAR PANDEY | INC | 5 | 0.94% | |
| 6 | HARINARAYAN | IND | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 7 | PRAFULL | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 8 | PRAVEEN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | SURESH CHAND | BASP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | CHHEDI MAJDOOR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | AWDHESH SINGH SAITHWAR | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | RAMCHANDRA | AJPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | SHATRUDHAN SINGH NISHAD | ASP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 531 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 338 | 63.65% | 1 | 30 | Strong |
| BSP | 100 | 18.83% | 2 | 143 | Weak |
| BJP | 73 | 13.75% | 3 | 447 | Weak |
| AIMEI | 12 | 2.26% | 4 | 69 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 0.94% | 5 | 230 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.56% | 6 | 416 | Poor |
| BASP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 308 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 439 | Poor |
| AJPI | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 316 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 340 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 319, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.