P.V. BARWA URF SIYARHIBHAR ROOM NO.2 PS 196
KRISHNABHAN
SPSAMAJWADI PARTY571 votes at this polling station
over OMPRAKASH CHAURASIA (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNABHAN | SP | 571 | 85.61% | |
| 2 | OMPRAKASH CHAURASIA | BSP | 34 | 5.10% | |
| 3 | GYANENDRA SINGH | BJP | 33 | 4.95% | |
| 4 | SHAMSHAD AALAM | AIMEI | 21 | 3.15% | |
| 5 | SHARDENDU KUMAR PANDEY | INC | 6 | 0.90% | |
| 6 | PRAVEEN | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 7 | AWDHESH SINGH SAITHWAR | AAP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 8 | RAMCHANDRA | AJPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | SHATRUDHAN SINGH NISHAD | ASP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | SURESH CHAND | BASP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | CHHEDI MAJDOOR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | PRAFULL | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | HARINARAYAN | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 667 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 571 | 85.61% | 1 | 1 | Strong |
| BSP | 34 | 5.10% | 2 | 316 | Poor |
| BJP | 33 | 4.95% | 3 | 468 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 21 | 3.15% | 4 | 46 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 0.90% | 5 | 184 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.15% | 7 | 461 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.15% | 6 | 356 | Poor |
| AJPI | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 314 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 336 | Poor |
| BASP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 307 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 319, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.