P.V. KHAICHA ROOM NO.2 PS 149
OMPRAKASH CHAURASIA
BSPBAHUJAN SAMAJ PARTY329 votes at this polling station
over GYANENDRA SINGH (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OMPRAKASH CHAURASIA | BSP | 329 | 55.57% | |
| 2 | GYANENDRA SINGH | BJP | 191 | 32.26% | |
| 3 | KRISHNABHAN | SP | 53 | 8.95% | |
| 4 | HARINARAYAN | IND | 7 | 1.18% | |
| 5 | AWDHESH SINGH SAITHWAR | AAP | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 6 | SURESH CHAND | BASP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 7 | AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI | IND | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 8 | PRAFULL | IND | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 9 | PRAVEEN | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 10 | SHAMSHAD AALAM | AIMEI | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | CHHEDI MAJDOOR | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 12 | SHARDENDU KUMAR PANDEY | INC | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | RAMCHANDRA | AJPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | SHATRUDHAN SINGH NISHAD | ASP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 592 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 329 | 55.57% | 1 | 1 | Strong |
| BJP | 191 | 32.26% | 2 | 368 | Average |
| SP | 53 | 8.95% | 3 | 427 | Poor |
| IND | 13 | 2.20% | 4 | 100 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.51% | 5 | 195 | Poor |
| BASP | 2 | 0.34% | 6 | 36 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 1 | 0.17% | 7 | 259 | Poor |
| INC | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 468 | Poor |
| AJPI | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 282 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 315 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 319, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.