P.S. KAVALPUR NORTH PS 91
Candidate Name-Virendra Chaudhary
COL 1818378 votes at this polling station
over Candidate Name-Bajrang Bahadur Singh (COL 15)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Candidate Name-Virendra Chaudhary | COL 18 | 378 | 60.58% | |
| 2 | Candidate Name-Bajrang Bahadur Singh | COL 15 | 163 | 26.12% | |
| 3 | Candidate Name-Ishoo Chaurasiya | COL 12 | 25 | 4.01% | |
| 4 | Candidate Name-Shankh Lal Majhi | COL 21 | 24 | 3.85% | |
| 5 | Candidate Name-Suryaprakash Chaturvedi | COL 33 | 9 | 1.44% | |
| 6 | Candidate Name-Ashutosh | COL 36 | 7 | 1.12% | |
| 7 | Candidate Name-Jaili | COL 24 | 7 | 1.12% | |
| 8 | Candidate Name -Ravi Prakash Vishwakarma | COL 27 | 6 | 0.96% | |
| 9 | Candidate Name-Dr. Rajan Kumar Yadav | COL 30 | 5 | 0.80% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 624 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 18 | 378 | 59.90% | 1 | 16 | Strong |
| COL 15 | 163 | 25.83% | 2 | 264 | Average |
| COL 12 | 25 | 3.96% | 3 | 253 | Poor |
| COL 21 | 24 | 3.80% | 4 | 237 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 9 | 1.43% | 5 | 3 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 7 | 1.11% | 7 | 5 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 7 | 1.11% | 6 | 4 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 6 | 0.95% | 8 | 4 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 5 | 0.79% | 9 | 4 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 315, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.