P. S. SONBARSA PS 185
Candidate Name-Virendra Chaudhary
COL 1818427 votes at this polling station
over Candidate Name-Bajrang Bahadur Singh (COL 15)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Candidate Name-Virendra Chaudhary | COL 18 | 427 | 58.49% | |
| 2 | Candidate Name-Bajrang Bahadur Singh | COL 15 | 181 | 24.79% | |
| 3 | Candidate Name-Ishoo Chaurasiya | COL 12 | 60 | 8.22% | |
| 4 | Candidate Name-Shankh Lal Majhi | COL 21 | 44 | 6.03% | |
| 5 | Candidate Name-Jaili | COL 24 | 5 | 0.68% | |
| 6 | Candidate Name-Suryaprakash Chaturvedi | COL 33 | 5 | 0.68% | |
| 7 | Candidate Name-Ashutosh | COL 36 | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 8 | Candidate Name -Ravi Prakash Vishwakarma | COL 27 | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 9 | Candidate Name-Dr. Rajan Kumar Yadav | COL 30 | 2 | 0.27% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 730 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 18 | 427 | 57.86% | 1 | 7 | Strong |
| COL 15 | 181 | 24.53% | 2 | 237 | Weak |
| COL 12 | 60 | 8.13% | 3 | 126 | Poor |
| COL 21 | 44 | 5.96% | 4 | 118 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 5 | 0.68% | 5 | 9 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 5 | 0.68% | 6 | 27 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 3 | 0.41% | 8 | 66 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 3 | 0.41% | 7 | 37 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 2 | 0.27% | 9 | 73 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 315, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.