P.S. KUSAHA PS 17
Candidate Name-Bajrang Bahadur Singh
COL 1515488 votes at this polling station
over Candidate Name-Virendra Chaudhary (COL 18)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Candidate Name-Bajrang Bahadur Singh | COL 15 | 488 | 69.81% | |
| 2 | Candidate Name-Virendra Chaudhary | COL 18 | 121 | 17.31% | |
| 3 | Candidate Name-Ishoo Chaurasiya | COL 12 | 74 | 10.59% | |
| 4 | Candidate Name-Shankh Lal Majhi | COL 21 | 11 | 1.57% | |
| 5 | Candidate Name-Suryaprakash Chaturvedi | COL 33 | 3 | 0.43% | |
| 6 | Candidate Name-Jaili | COL 24 | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 7 | Candidate Name -Ravi Prakash Vishwakarma | COL 27 | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 8 | Candidate Name-Dr. Rajan Kumar Yadav | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Candidate Name-Ashutosh | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 699 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 15 | 488 | 69.71% | 1 | 1 | Strong |
| COL 18 | 121 | 17.29% | 2 | 349 | Weak |
| COL 12 | 74 | 10.57% | 3 | 94 | Weak |
| COL 21 | 11 | 1.57% | 4 | 357 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 3 | 0.43% | 5 | 56 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 1 | 0.14% | 6 | 145 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 1 | 0.14% | 7 | 134 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 251 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 279 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 315, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.