PRATHMIK VIDYALYA KURTHIYA ROOM NO-1 PS 52
Mahendra Nath Yadav
SPSP174 votes at this polling station
over Dayaram Chaudhary (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mahendra Nath Yadav | SP | 174 | 55.59% | |
| 2 | Dayaram Chaudhary | BJP | 97 | 30.99% | |
| 3 | Dr. Alok Ranjan Verma | BSP | 27 | 8.63% | |
| 4 | Devendra Kumar Srivastav | INC | 11 | 3.51% | |
| 5 | Ambrish Dev Gupta ‘Sonu’ | BMP | 3 | 0.96% | |
| 6 | Pradeep Kumar | BMPP | 1 | 0.32% | |
| 7 | Ramesh Kumar Singh | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Ram Prasad Chaurasiya | JKP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Gyan Prakash Tripathi | AJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Babita Shukla | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Arbabul Haq | ASP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 313 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 174 | 55.24% | 1 | 199 | Strong |
| BJP | 97 | 30.79% | 2 | 415 | Average |
| BSP | 27 | 8.57% | 3 | 345 | Poor |
| INC | 11 | 3.49% | 4 | 96 | Poor |
| BMP | 3 | 0.95% | 5 | 131 | Poor |
| BMPP | 1 | 0.32% | 6 | 65 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 295 | Poor |
| AJP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 304 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 264 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 311 | Poor |
| JKP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 271 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 310, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.