POORV MADHYMIK VIDYALYA MANJHARIYA ROOM NO-2 PS 449
Mahendra Nath Yadav
SPSP218 votes at this polling station
over Dr. Alok Ranjan Verma (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mahendra Nath Yadav | SP | 218 | 43.43% | |
| 2 | Dr. Alok Ranjan Verma | BSP | 137 | 27.29% | |
| 3 | Dayaram Chaudhary | BJP | 129 | 25.70% | |
| 4 | Devendra Kumar Srivastav | INC | 6 | 1.20% | |
| 5 | Ram Prasad Chaurasiya | JKP | 3 | 0.60% | |
| 6 | Babita Shukla | IND | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 7 | Ambrish Dev Gupta ‘Sonu’ | BMP | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 8 | Pradeep Kumar | BMPP | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 9 | Ramesh Kumar Singh | AAP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 10 | Arbabul Haq | ASP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 11 | Gyan Prakash Tripathi | AJP | 1 | 0.20% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 502 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 218 | 43.25% | 1 | 110 | Strong |
| BSP | 137 | 27.18% | 2 | 81 | Average |
| BJP | 129 | 25.60% | 3 | 333 | Average |
| INC | 6 | 1.19% | 4 | 294 | Poor |
| JKP | 3 | 0.60% | 5 | 42 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.40% | 8 | 153 | Poor |
| BMP | 2 | 0.40% | 6 | 292 | Poor |
| BMPP | 2 | 0.40% | 7 | 47 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.20% | 9 | 266 | Poor |
| AJP | 1 | 0.20% | 10 | 267 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.20% | 11 | 225 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 310, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.