KISAN INTER COLLEGE MARAHA KATYA GOTWA ROOM NO-2 PS 441
Mahendra Nath Yadav
SPSP322 votes at this polling station
over Dayaram Chaudhary (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mahendra Nath Yadav | SP | 322 | 48.20% | |
| 2 | Dayaram Chaudhary | BJP | 245 | 36.68% | |
| 3 | Dr. Alok Ranjan Verma | BSP | 91 | 13.62% | |
| 4 | Devendra Kumar Srivastav | INC | 4 | 0.60% | |
| 5 | Ambrish Dev Gupta ‘Sonu’ | BMP | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 6 | Ram Prasad Chaurasiya | JKP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 7 | Gyan Prakash Tripathi | AJP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 8 | Babita Shukla | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 9 | Arbabul Haq | ASP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Pradeep Kumar | BMPP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Ramesh Kumar Singh | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 668 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 322 | 48.20% | 1 | 31 | Strong |
| BJP | 245 | 36.68% | 2 | 67 | Average |
| BSP | 91 | 13.62% | 3 | 162 | Weak |
| INC | 4 | 0.60% | 4 | 381 | Poor |
| BMP | 3 | 0.45% | 5 | 190 | Poor |
| AJP | 1 | 0.15% | 6 | 265 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.15% | 7 | 282 | Poor |
| JKP | 1 | 0.15% | 8 | 242 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 472 | Poor |
| BMPP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 457 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 469 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 310, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.