ADARSH POORV MADHYAMIK VIDYALAYA UMARI AHARA ROOM NO-2 PS 366
Mahendra Nath Yadav
SPSP219 votes at this polling station
over Dayaram Chaudhary (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mahendra Nath Yadav | SP | 219 | 68.44% | |
| 2 | Dayaram Chaudhary | BJP | 78 | 24.38% | |
| 3 | Dr. Alok Ranjan Verma | BSP | 16 | 5.00% | |
| 4 | Devendra Kumar Srivastav | INC | 4 | 1.25% | |
| 5 | Ambrish Dev Gupta ‘Sonu’ | BMP | 2 | 0.62% | |
| 6 | Ram Prasad Chaurasiya | JKP | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 7 | Gyan Prakash Tripathi | AJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Babita Shukla | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Arbabul Haq | ASP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Pradeep Kumar | BMPP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Ramesh Kumar Singh | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 320 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 219 | 68.44% | 1 | 107 | Strong |
| BJP | 78 | 24.38% | 2 | 447 | Weak |
| BSP | 16 | 5.00% | 3 | 385 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 1.25% | 4 | 375 | Poor |
| BMP | 2 | 0.63% | 5 | 271 | Poor |
| JKP | 1 | 0.31% | 6 | 221 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 451 | Poor |
| BMPP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 417 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 439 | Poor |
| AJP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 458 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 439 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 310, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.