PRATHMIK VIDYALYA JAMDEEH PANDEY SECOND ROOM NO-1 PS 276
Dayaram Chaudhary
BJPBJP241 votes at this polling station
over Mahendra Nath Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dayaram Chaudhary | BJP | 241 | 60.40% | |
| 2 | Mahendra Nath Yadav | SP | 86 | 21.55% | |
| 3 | Dr. Alok Ranjan Verma | BSP | 61 | 15.29% | |
| 4 | Devendra Kumar Srivastav | INC | 10 | 2.51% | |
| 5 | Babita Shukla | IND | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 6 | Ambrish Dev Gupta ‘Sonu’ | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 7 | Arbabul Haq | ASP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Pradeep Kumar | BMPP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Ramesh Kumar Singh | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Ram Prasad Chaurasiya | JKP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Gyan Prakash Tripathi | AJP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 399 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 241 | 60.40% | 1 | 70 | Strong |
| SP | 86 | 21.55% | 2 | 433 | Weak |
| BSP | 61 | 15.29% | 3 | 244 | Weak |
| INC | 10 | 2.51% | 4 | 134 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.25% | 5 | 230 | Poor |
| JKP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 398 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 463 | Poor |
| BMPP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 355 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 399 | Poor |
| AJP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 423 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 396 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 310, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.