GOVINDRAM SAXERIYA INTER COLLEGE BASTI ROOM NO-4 PS 141
Dayaram Chaudhary
BJPBJP155 votes at this polling station
over Mahendra Nath Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dayaram Chaudhary | BJP | 155 | 53.63% | |
| 2 | Mahendra Nath Yadav | SP | 57 | 19.72% | |
| 3 | Dr. Alok Ranjan Verma | BSP | 38 | 13.15% | |
| 4 | Devendra Kumar Srivastav | INC | 36 | 12.46% | |
| 5 | Ambrish Dev Gupta ‘Sonu’ | BMP | 3 | 1.04% | |
| 6 | Arbabul Haq | ASP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 7 | Pradeep Kumar | BMPP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Ramesh Kumar Singh | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Ram Prasad Chaurasiya | JKP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Gyan Prakash Tripathi | AJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Babita Shukla | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 289 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 155 | 53.08% | 1 | 267 | Strong |
| SP | 57 | 19.52% | 2 | 481 | Weak |
| BSP | 38 | 13.01% | 3 | 305 | Weak |
| INC | 36 | 12.33% | 4 | 5 | Weak |
| BMP | 3 | 1.03% | 5 | 146 | Poor |
| BMPP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 250 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 333 | Poor |
| AJP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 339 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 311 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 343 | Poor |
| JKP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 316 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 310, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.