PRATHMIK VIDYALAYA TUSAYAL ROOM NO. 2 PS 98
Rajendra Prasad Chaudhary
SPSP228 votes at this polling station
over Sangeeta Devi Urf Sangeeta Pratap Jaiswal (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rajendra Prasad Chaudhary | SP | 228 | 72.15% | |
| 2 | Sangeeta Devi Urf Sangeeta Pratap Jaiswal | BJP | 25 | 7.91% | |
| 3 | Pushkaraditya Singh | AAP | 25 | 7.91% | |
| 4 | Ashok Kumar | BSP | 14 | 4.43% | |
| 5 | Basant Chaudhary | INC | 5 | 1.58% | |
| 6 | Nihaluddin | AIMEM | 3 | 0.95% | |
| 7 | Mohd. Kayoom | AJSP | 3 | 0.95% | |
| 8 | Laxmikant Bhatt | IND | 3 | 0.95% | |
| 9 | Sunil Kumar | IND | 2 | 0.63% | |
| 10 | Mahfooj Ali | PP | 2 | 0.63% | |
| 11 | Prem Kumar | IND | 2 | 0.63% | |
| 12 | Jai Govind Pandey | ABSP | 2 | 0.63% | |
| 13 | Neelam | LP | 1 | 0.32% | |
| 14 | Ajay Pratap | IND | 1 | 0.32% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 316 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 228 | 71.92% | 1 | 105 | Strong |
| AAP | 25 | 7.89% | 2 | 257 | Poor |
| BJP | 25 | 7.89% | 3 | 519 | Poor |
| BSP | 14 | 4.42% | 4 | 464 | Poor |
| IND | 8 | 2.52% | 5 | 76 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 1.58% | 6 | 265 | Poor |
| AIMEM | 3 | 0.95% | 7 | 189 | Poor |
| AJSP | 3 | 0.95% | 8 | 173 | Poor |
| ABSP | 2 | 0.63% | 9 | 157 | Poor |
| PP | 2 | 0.63% | 10 | 90 | Poor |
| LP | 1 | 0.32% | 11 | 136 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 309, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.