PRATHMIK VIDYALAYA PAKDI ROOM NO. 1 PS 62
Rajendra Prasad Chaudhary
SPSP182 votes at this polling station
over Sangeeta Devi Urf Sangeeta Pratap Jaiswal (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rajendra Prasad Chaudhary | SP | 182 | 79.13% | |
| 2 | Sangeeta Devi Urf Sangeeta Pratap Jaiswal | BJP | 19 | 8.26% | |
| 3 | Basant Chaudhary | INC | 14 | 6.09% | |
| 4 | Nihaluddin | AIMEM | 5 | 2.17% | |
| 5 | Ashok Kumar | BSP | 4 | 1.74% | |
| 6 | Mohd. Kayoom | AJSP | 2 | 0.87% | |
| 7 | Mahfooj Ali | PP | 2 | 0.87% | |
| 8 | Prem Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.43% | |
| 9 | Neelam | LP | 1 | 0.43% | |
| 10 | Pushkaraditya Singh | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Jai Govind Pandey | ABSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Laxmikant Bhatt | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Sunil Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Ajay Pratap | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 230 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 182 | 78.79% | 1 | 188 | Strong |
| BJP | 19 | 8.23% | 2 | 528 | Poor |
| INC | 14 | 6.06% | 3 | 60 | Poor |
| AIMEM | 5 | 2.16% | 4 | 131 | Poor |
| BSP | 4 | 1.73% | 5 | 518 | Poor |
| AJSP | 2 | 0.87% | 6 | 252 | Poor |
| PP | 2 | 0.87% | 7 | 83 | Poor |
| LP | 1 | 0.43% | 9 | 126 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.43% | 8 | 467 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 532 | Poor |
| ABSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 388 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 309, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.