PRATHMIK VIDYALAYA BHOLAPUR PS 5
Rajendra Prasad Chaudhary
SPSP294 votes at this polling station
over Sangeeta Devi Urf Sangeeta Pratap Jaiswal (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rajendra Prasad Chaudhary | SP | 294 | 48.92% | |
| 2 | Sangeeta Devi Urf Sangeeta Pratap Jaiswal | BJP | 181 | 30.12% | |
| 3 | Ashok Kumar | BSP | 48 | 7.99% | |
| 4 | Nihaluddin | AIMEM | 38 | 6.32% | |
| 5 | Pushkaraditya Singh | AAP | 13 | 2.16% | |
| 6 | Basant Chaudhary | INC | 9 | 1.50% | |
| 7 | Prem Kumar | IND | 5 | 0.83% | |
| 8 | Jai Govind Pandey | ABSP | 5 | 0.83% | |
| 9 | Mohd. Kayoom | AJSP | 4 | 0.67% | |
| 10 | Mahfooj Ali | PP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | Ajay Pratap | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 12 | Laxmikant Bhatt | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 13 | Sunil Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 14 | Neelam | LP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 601 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 294 | 48.84% | 1 | 27 | Strong |
| BJP | 181 | 30.07% | 2 | 125 | Average |
| BSP | 48 | 7.97% | 3 | 319 | Poor |
| AIMEM | 38 | 6.31% | 4 | 16 | Poor |
| AAP | 13 | 2.16% | 5 | 349 | Poor |
| INC | 9 | 1.50% | 6 | 132 | Poor |
| IND | 8 | 1.33% | 7 | 71 | Poor |
| ABSP | 5 | 0.83% | 8 | 28 | Poor |
| AJSP | 4 | 0.66% | 9 | 105 | Poor |
| PP | 1 | 0.17% | 10 | 159 | Poor |
| LP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 274 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 309, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.