PRATHMIK VIDYALAYA KATHAKPURWA ROOM NO. 2 PS 466
Rajendra Prasad Chaudhary
SPSP175 votes at this polling station
over Pushkaraditya Singh (AAP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rajendra Prasad Chaudhary | SP | 175 | 49.86% | |
| 2 | Pushkaraditya Singh | AAP | 124 | 35.33% | |
| 3 | Ashok Kumar | BSP | 18 | 5.13% | |
| 4 | Sangeeta Devi Urf Sangeeta Pratap Jaiswal | BJP | 11 | 3.13% | |
| 5 | Nihaluddin | AIMEM | 9 | 2.56% | |
| 6 | Mahfooj Ali | PP | 7 | 1.99% | |
| 7 | Basant Chaudhary | INC | 2 | 0.57% | |
| 8 | Jai Govind Pandey | ABSP | 2 | 0.57% | |
| 9 | Neelam | LP | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 10 | Laxmikant Bhatt | IND | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 11 | Ajay Pratap | IND | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 12 | Prem Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Mohd. Kayoom | AJSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Sunil Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 351 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 175 | 49.58% | 1 | 213 | Strong |
| AAP | 124 | 35.13% | 2 | 46 | Average |
| BSP | 18 | 5.10% | 3 | 450 | Poor |
| BJP | 11 | 3.12% | 4 | 535 | Poor |
| AIMEM | 9 | 2.55% | 5 | 99 | Poor |
| PP | 7 | 1.98% | 6 | 9 | Poor |
| ABSP | 2 | 0.57% | 7 | 220 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.57% | 8 | 469 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.57% | 9 | 452 | Poor |
| LP | 1 | 0.28% | 10 | 249 | Poor |
| AJSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 524 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 309, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.