PRATHMIK VIDYALAYA MAHUAAR ROOM NO. 3 PS 442
Ashok Kumar
BSPBSP169 votes at this polling station
over Sangeeta Devi Urf Sangeeta Pratap Jaiswal (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ashok Kumar | BSP | 169 | 36.03% | |
| 2 | Sangeeta Devi Urf Sangeeta Pratap Jaiswal | BJP | 165 | 35.18% | |
| 3 | Rajendra Prasad Chaudhary | SP | 94 | 20.04% | |
| 4 | Pushkaraditya Singh | AAP | 18 | 3.84% | |
| 5 | Basant Chaudhary | INC | 6 | 1.28% | |
| 6 | Mohd. Kayoom | AJSP | 4 | 0.85% | |
| 7 | Nihaluddin | AIMEM | 4 | 0.85% | |
| 8 | Sunil Kumar | IND | 3 | 0.64% | |
| 9 | Jai Govind Pandey | ABSP | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 10 | Ajay Pratap | IND | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 11 | Laxmikant Bhatt | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 12 | Neelam | LP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 13 | Mahfooj Ali | PP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Prem Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 469 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 169 | 35.58% | 1 | 27 | Average |
| BJP | 165 | 34.74% | 2 | 160 | Average |
| SP | 94 | 19.79% | 3 | 417 | Weak |
| AAP | 18 | 3.79% | 4 | 316 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 1.26% | 5 | 253 | Poor |
| IND | 6 | 1.26% | 6 | 176 | Poor |
| AIMEM | 4 | 0.84% | 7 | 173 | Poor |
| AJSP | 4 | 0.84% | 8 | 146 | Poor |
| ABSP | 2 | 0.42% | 9 | 215 | Poor |
| LP | 1 | 0.21% | 10 | 238 | Poor |
| PP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 492 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 309, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.