PRATHMIK VIDYALAYA MAHUAAR ROOM NO. 2 PS 441
Ashok Kumar
BSPBSP169 votes at this polling station
over Sangeeta Devi Urf Sangeeta Pratap Jaiswal (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ashok Kumar | BSP | 169 | 41.12% | |
| 2 | Sangeeta Devi Urf Sangeeta Pratap Jaiswal | BJP | 109 | 26.52% | |
| 3 | Rajendra Prasad Chaudhary | SP | 98 | 23.84% | |
| 4 | Pushkaraditya Singh | AAP | 16 | 3.89% | |
| 5 | Basant Chaudhary | INC | 5 | 1.22% | |
| 6 | Mohd. Kayoom | AJSP | 5 | 1.22% | |
| 7 | Jai Govind Pandey | ABSP | 4 | 0.97% | |
| 8 | Ajay Pratap | IND | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 9 | Mahfooj Ali | PP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 10 | Laxmikant Bhatt | IND | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 11 | Neelam | LP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 12 | Nihaluddin | AIMEM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Sunil Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Prem Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 411 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 169 | 41.02% | 1 | 26 | Strong |
| BJP | 109 | 26.46% | 2 | 306 | Average |
| SP | 98 | 23.79% | 3 | 411 | Weak |
| AAP | 16 | 3.88% | 4 | 335 | Poor |
| AJSP | 5 | 1.21% | 5 | 99 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 1.21% | 6 | 296 | Poor |
| ABSP | 4 | 0.97% | 7 | 70 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.73% | 8 | 393 | Poor |
| LP | 1 | 0.24% | 9 | 237 | Poor |
| PP | 1 | 0.24% | 10 | 290 | Poor |
| AIMEM | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 510 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 309, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.