PRATHMIK VIDYALAYA PAKARI SOYAM ROOM NO. 2 PS 423
Pushkaraditya Singh
AAPAAP157 votes at this polling station
over Rajendra Prasad Chaudhary (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pushkaraditya Singh | AAP | 157 | 35.93% | |
| 2 | Rajendra Prasad Chaudhary | SP | 144 | 32.95% | |
| 3 | Ashok Kumar | BSP | 70 | 16.02% | |
| 4 | Sangeeta Devi Urf Sangeeta Pratap Jaiswal | BJP | 39 | 8.92% | |
| 5 | Nihaluddin | AIMEM | 14 | 3.20% | |
| 6 | Laxmikant Bhatt | IND | 3 | 0.69% | |
| 7 | Jai Govind Pandey | ABSP | 3 | 0.69% | |
| 8 | Basant Chaudhary | INC | 3 | 0.69% | |
| 9 | Mohd. Kayoom | AJSP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 10 | Mahfooj Ali | PP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 11 | Sunil Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 12 | Neelam | LP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 13 | Ajay Pratap | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Prem Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 437 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAP | 157 | 35.93% | 1 | 25 | Average |
| SP | 144 | 32.95% | 2 | 295 | Average |
| BSP | 70 | 16.02% | 3 | 229 | Weak |
| BJP | 39 | 8.92% | 4 | 503 | Poor |
| AIMEM | 14 | 3.20% | 5 | 59 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.92% | 6 | 301 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.69% | 8 | 401 | Poor |
| ABSP | 3 | 0.69% | 7 | 127 | Poor |
| AJSP | 1 | 0.23% | 9 | 441 | Poor |
| LP | 1 | 0.23% | 10 | 230 | Poor |
| PP | 1 | 0.23% | 11 | 285 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 309, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.