PRATHMIK VIDYALAYA DHANGHATA ROOM NO. 1 PS 392
Pushkaraditya Singh
AAPAAP178 votes at this polling station
over Rajendra Prasad Chaudhary (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pushkaraditya Singh | AAP | 178 | 42.08% | |
| 2 | Rajendra Prasad Chaudhary | SP | 84 | 19.86% | |
| 3 | Ashok Kumar | BSP | 64 | 15.13% | |
| 4 | Nihaluddin | AIMEM | 49 | 11.58% | |
| 5 | Sangeeta Devi Urf Sangeeta Pratap Jaiswal | BJP | 32 | 7.57% | |
| 6 | Jai Govind Pandey | ABSP | 6 | 1.42% | |
| 7 | Laxmikant Bhatt | IND | 3 | 0.71% | |
| 8 | Mohd. Kayoom | AJSP | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 9 | Basant Chaudhary | INC | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 10 | Ajay Pratap | IND | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 11 | Prem Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 12 | Neelam | LP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 13 | Mahfooj Ali | PP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Sunil Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 423 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAP | 178 | 41.98% | 1 | 17 | Strong |
| SP | 84 | 19.81% | 2 | 437 | Weak |
| BSP | 64 | 15.09% | 3 | 257 | Weak |
| AIMEM | 49 | 11.56% | 4 | 8 | Weak |
| BJP | 32 | 7.55% | 5 | 512 | Poor |
| ABSP | 6 | 1.42% | 6 | 25 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 1.18% | 7 | 236 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.47% | 9 | 457 | Poor |
| AJSP | 2 | 0.47% | 8 | 314 | Poor |
| LP | 1 | 0.24% | 10 | 220 | Poor |
| PP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 478 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 309, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.