PRATHMIK VIDYALAYA KUDIYA BAZAR PACHARI KALA ROOM NO. 1 PS 385
Pushkaraditya Singh
AAPAAP295 votes at this polling station
over Rajendra Prasad Chaudhary (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pushkaraditya Singh | AAP | 295 | 64.69% | |
| 2 | Rajendra Prasad Chaudhary | SP | 52 | 11.40% | |
| 3 | Sangeeta Devi Urf Sangeeta Pratap Jaiswal | BJP | 44 | 9.65% | |
| 4 | Ashok Kumar | BSP | 32 | 7.02% | |
| 5 | Basant Chaudhary | INC | 13 | 2.85% | |
| 6 | Nihaluddin | AIMEM | 9 | 1.97% | |
| 7 | Neelam | LP | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 8 | Mahfooj Ali | PP | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 9 | Jai Govind Pandey | ABSP | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 10 | Laxmikant Bhatt | IND | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 11 | Sunil Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 12 | Prem Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 13 | Mohd. Kayoom | AJSP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 14 | Ajay Pratap | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 456 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAP | 295 | 64.13% | 1 | 3 | Strong |
| SP | 52 | 11.30% | 2 | 495 | Weak |
| BJP | 44 | 9.57% | 3 | 489 | Poor |
| BSP | 32 | 6.96% | 4 | 397 | Poor |
| INC | 13 | 2.83% | 5 | 74 | Poor |
| AIMEM | 9 | 1.96% | 6 | 97 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.87% | 7 | 294 | Poor |
| LP | 2 | 0.43% | 9 | 82 | Poor |
| PP | 2 | 0.43% | 10 | 131 | Poor |
| ABSP | 2 | 0.43% | 8 | 203 | Poor |
| AJSP | 1 | 0.22% | 11 | 431 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 309, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.