PRATHMIK VIDYALAYA KEUWAJAPTI ROOM NO. 2 PS 315
Sangeeta Devi Urf Sangeeta Pratap Jaiswal
BJPBJP93 votes at this polling station
over Ashok Kumar (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sangeeta Devi Urf Sangeeta Pratap Jaiswal | BJP | 93 | 46.73% | |
| 2 | Ashok Kumar | BSP | 63 | 31.66% | |
| 3 | Rajendra Prasad Chaudhary | SP | 32 | 16.08% | |
| 4 | Basant Chaudhary | INC | 4 | 2.01% | |
| 5 | Pushkaraditya Singh | AAP | 3 | 1.51% | |
| 6 | Mohd. Kayoom | AJSP | 2 | 1.01% | |
| 7 | Laxmikant Bhatt | IND | 1 | 0.50% | |
| 8 | Sunil Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.50% | |
| 9 | Jai Govind Pandey | ABSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Nihaluddin | AIMEM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Neelam | LP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Mahfooj Ali | PP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Ajay Pratap | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Prem Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 199 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 93 | 46.50% | 1 | 359 | Strong |
| BSP | 63 | 31.50% | 2 | 261 | Average |
| SP | 32 | 16.00% | 3 | 518 | Weak |
| INC | 4 | 2.00% | 4 | 336 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 1.50% | 5 | 499 | Poor |
| AJSP | 2 | 1.00% | 6 | 302 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 1.00% | 7 | 432 | Poor |
| LP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 431 | Poor |
| PP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 450 | Poor |
| ABSP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 476 | Poor |
| AIMEM | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 491 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 309, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.