PRATHMIK VIDYALAYA BEILI ROOM NO. 1 PS 140
Rajendra Prasad Chaudhary
SPSP358 votes at this polling station
over Sangeeta Devi Urf Sangeeta Pratap Jaiswal (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rajendra Prasad Chaudhary | SP | 358 | 77.16% | |
| 2 | Sangeeta Devi Urf Sangeeta Pratap Jaiswal | BJP | 49 | 10.56% | |
| 3 | Ashok Kumar | BSP | 24 | 5.17% | |
| 4 | Basant Chaudhary | INC | 17 | 3.66% | |
| 5 | Pushkaraditya Singh | AAP | 5 | 1.08% | |
| 6 | Nihaluddin | AIMEM | 4 | 0.86% | |
| 7 | Laxmikant Bhatt | IND | 3 | 0.65% | |
| 8 | Jai Govind Pandey | ABSP | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 9 | Prem Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 10 | Mahfooj Ali | PP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 11 | Ajay Pratap | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Neelam | LP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Mohd. Kayoom | AJSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Sunil Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 464 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 358 | 76.99% | 1 | 10 | Strong |
| BJP | 49 | 10.54% | 2 | 474 | Weak |
| BSP | 24 | 5.16% | 3 | 427 | Poor |
| INC | 17 | 3.66% | 4 | 42 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 1.08% | 5 | 453 | Poor |
| AIMEM | 4 | 0.86% | 6 | 157 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.86% | 7 | 267 | Poor |
| ABSP | 2 | 0.43% | 8 | 164 | Poor |
| PP | 1 | 0.22% | 9 | 198 | Poor |
| AJSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 481 | Poor |
| LP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 336 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 309, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.