50&fcyoV PS 50
SAIYADA KHATOON
SPSamajwadi Party268 votes at this polling station
over RAGHVENDRA PRATAP SINGH (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAIYADA KHATOON | SP | 268 | 74.03% | |
| 2 | RAGHVENDRA PRATAP SINGH | BJP | 75 | 20.72% | |
| 3 | IRFAN AHMAD MALIK | AIMEI | 6 | 1.66% | |
| 4 | ASHOK KUMAR TEWARI | BSP | 4 | 1.10% | |
| 5 | RAM UGRH | IND | 3 | 0.83% | |
| 6 | KANTI | INC | 2 | 0.55% | |
| 7 | RAJESH KUMAR AGRAHARI | IND | 2 | 0.55% | |
| 8 | SHIV KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 9 | NOTA | NOTA | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 10 | ABDUL HANNAN CHAUDHARY | RBS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Er. QAZI IMRAN LATEEF | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | PAWAN KUMAR | JDU | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | SHAILENDRA URF RAJU SRIVASTAV | SS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | SAILENDRA KUMAR | BMP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 362 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 268 | 74.03% | 1 | 77 | Strong |
| BJP | 75 | 20.72% | 2 | 396 | Weak |
| IND | 6 | 1.66% | 4 | 180 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 6 | 1.66% | 3 | 176 | Poor |
| BSP | 4 | 1.10% | 5 | 429 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.55% | 6 | 295 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.28% | 7 | 276 | Poor |
| RBS | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 372 | Poor |
| SS | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 419 | Poor |
| JDU | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 212 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 234 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 271 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 306, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.