468&dBksyok PS 468
SAIYADA KHATOON
SPSamajwadi Party311 votes at this polling station
over ASHOK KUMAR TEWARI (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAIYADA KHATOON | SP | 311 | 61.46% | |
| 2 | ASHOK KUMAR TEWARI | BSP | 86 | 17.00% | |
| 3 | RAGHVENDRA PRATAP SINGH | BJP | 71 | 14.03% | |
| 4 | SHAILENDRA URF RAJU SRIVASTAV | SS | 12 | 2.37% | |
| 5 | KANTI | INC | 7 | 1.38% | |
| 6 | NOTA | NOTA | 6 | 1.19% | |
| 7 | RAJESH KUMAR AGRAHARI | IND | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 8 | ABDUL HANNAN CHAUDHARY | RBS | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 9 | IRFAN AHMAD MALIK | AIMEI | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 10 | RAM UGRH | IND | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 11 | SHIV KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 12 | SAILENDRA KUMAR | BMP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 13 | PAWAN KUMAR | JDU | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Er. QAZI IMRAN LATEEF | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 506 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 311 | 61.46% | 1 | 47 | Strong |
| BSP | 86 | 17.00% | 2 | 56 | Weak |
| BJP | 71 | 14.03% | 3 | 402 | Weak |
| SS | 12 | 2.37% | 4 | 101 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 1.38% | 5 | 106 | Poor |
| NOTA | 6 | 1.19% | 7 | 40 | Poor |
| IND | 6 | 1.19% | 6 | 213 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 3 | 0.59% | 8 | 275 | Poor |
| RBS | 3 | 0.59% | 9 | 127 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.20% | 10 | 249 | Poor |
| JDU | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 478 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 476 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 306, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.