322&yfV;k vka0 PS 322
SAIYADA KHATOON
SPSamajwadi Party323 votes at this polling station
over ASHOK KUMAR TEWARI (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAIYADA KHATOON | SP | 323 | 74.60% | |
| 2 | ASHOK KUMAR TEWARI | BSP | 56 | 12.93% | |
| 3 | RAGHVENDRA PRATAP SINGH | BJP | 30 | 6.93% | |
| 4 | Er. QAZI IMRAN LATEEF | AAP | 7 | 1.62% | |
| 5 | IRFAN AHMAD MALIK | AIMEI | 5 | 1.15% | |
| 6 | KANTI | INC | 4 | 0.92% | |
| 7 | ABDUL HANNAN CHAUDHARY | RBS | 3 | 0.69% | |
| 8 | SHAILENDRA URF RAJU SRIVASTAV | SS | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 9 | SAILENDRA KUMAR | BMP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 10 | RAJESH KUMAR AGRAHARI | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 11 | RAM UGRH | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 12 | NOTA | NOTA | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 13 | PAWAN KUMAR | JDU | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | SHIV KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 433 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 323 | 74.60% | 1 | 39 | Strong |
| BSP | 56 | 12.93% | 2 | 122 | Weak |
| BJP | 30 | 6.93% | 3 | 456 | Poor |
| AAP | 7 | 1.62% | 4 | 5 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 5 | 1.15% | 5 | 215 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.92% | 6 | 207 | Poor |
| RBS | 3 | 0.69% | 7 | 106 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.46% | 8 | 399 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.23% | 9 | 203 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.23% | 10 | 345 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.23% | 11 | 393 | Poor |
| JDU | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 385 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 306, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.