183&gYykSj vka0 PS 183
SAIYADA KHATOON
SPSamajwadi Party410 votes at this polling station
over ABDUL HANNAN CHAUDHARY (RBS)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAIYADA KHATOON | SP | 410 | 97.16% | |
| 2 | ABDUL HANNAN CHAUDHARY | RBS | 4 | 0.95% | |
| 3 | RAGHVENDRA PRATAP SINGH | BJP | 3 | 0.71% | |
| 4 | KANTI | INC | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 5 | Er. QAZI IMRAN LATEEF | AAP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 6 | RAM UGRH | IND | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 7 | SHIV KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 8 | NOTA | NOTA | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 9 | ASHOK KUMAR TEWARI | BSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | PAWAN KUMAR | JDU | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | SHAILENDRA URF RAJU SRIVASTAV | SS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SAILENDRA KUMAR | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | RAJESH KUMAR AGRAHARI | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | IRFAN AHMAD MALIK | AIMEI | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 422 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 410 | 97.16% | 1 | 13 | Strong |
| RBS | 4 | 0.95% | 2 | 41 | Poor |
| BJP | 3 | 0.71% | 3 | 485 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.47% | 4 | 386 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.24% | 6 | 391 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.24% | 5 | 112 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.24% | 7 | 305 | Poor |
| SS | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 447 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 441 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 342 | Poor |
| BSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 485 | Poor |
| JDU | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 298 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 306, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.