177&tctkSok vka0 PS 177
SAIYADA KHATOON
SPSamajwadi Party412 votes at this polling station
over IRFAN AHMAD MALIK (AIMEI)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAIYADA KHATOON | SP | 412 | 88.22% | |
| 2 | IRFAN AHMAD MALIK | AIMEI | 23 | 4.93% | |
| 3 | RAGHVENDRA PRATAP SINGH | BJP | 14 | 3.00% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 4 | 0.86% | |
| 5 | SHIV KUMAR | IND | 3 | 0.64% | |
| 6 | ABDUL HANNAN CHAUDHARY | RBS | 3 | 0.64% | |
| 7 | ASHOK KUMAR TEWARI | BSP | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 8 | KANTI | INC | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 9 | SHAILENDRA URF RAJU SRIVASTAV | SS | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 10 | SAILENDRA KUMAR | BMP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 11 | PAWAN KUMAR | JDU | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 12 | RAJESH KUMAR AGRAHARI | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | RAM UGRH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Er. QAZI IMRAN LATEEF | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 467 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 412 | 88.22% | 1 | 12 | Strong |
| AIMEI | 23 | 4.93% | 2 | 40 | Poor |
| BJP | 14 | 3.00% | 3 | 471 | Poor |
| NOTA | 4 | 0.86% | 4 | 93 | Poor |
| RBS | 3 | 0.64% | 6 | 87 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.64% | 5 | 336 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.43% | 8 | 319 | Poor |
| BSP | 2 | 0.43% | 7 | 454 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.43% | 9 | 306 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.21% | 10 | 156 | Poor |
| JDU | 1 | 0.21% | 11 | 121 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 314 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 306, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.