115&[kEgfj;k PS 115
SAIYADA KHATOON
SPSamajwadi Party161 votes at this polling station
over IRFAN AHMAD MALIK (AIMEI)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAIYADA KHATOON | SP | 161 | 74.19% | |
| 2 | IRFAN AHMAD MALIK | AIMEI | 30 | 13.82% | |
| 3 | RAGHVENDRA PRATAP SINGH | BJP | 21 | 9.68% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 2 | 0.92% | |
| 5 | SHAILENDRA URF RAJU SRIVASTAV | SS | 2 | 0.92% | |
| 6 | SAILENDRA KUMAR | BMP | 1 | 0.46% | |
| 7 | RAJESH KUMAR AGRAHARI | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | RAM UGRH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | SHIV KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | ABDUL HANNAN CHAUDHARY | RBS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Er. QAZI IMRAN LATEEF | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | ASHOK KUMAR TEWARI | BSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | KANTI | INC | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | PAWAN KUMAR | JDU | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 217 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 161 | 74.19% | 1 | 241 | Strong |
| AIMEI | 30 | 13.82% | 2 | 27 | Weak |
| BJP | 21 | 9.68% | 3 | 461 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.92% | 4 | 195 | Poor |
| SS | 2 | 0.92% | 5 | 301 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.46% | 6 | 136 | Poor |
| BSP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 478 | Poor |
| RBS | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 388 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 473 | Poor |
| INC | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 454 | Poor |
| JDU | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 247 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 276 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 306, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.