izk0fo0 tfu;ktksr PS 57
Jai Pratap Singh
BJPBharatiya Janata Party230 votes at this polling station
over Radheshyam Pandey (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jai Pratap Singh | BJP | 230 | 52.87% | |
| 2 | Radheshyam Pandey | BSP | 114 | 26.21% | |
| 3 | Naveen Alias Monu Dubey | SP | 61 | 14.02% | |
| 4 | Kiran Shukla | INC | 12 | 2.76% | |
| 5 | Dinesh | BEP | 4 | 0.92% | |
| 6 | Shakuntala | SDU | 4 | 0.92% | |
| 7 | Saimuhammad | AIMEI | 3 | 0.69% | |
| 8 | Roonmati | ASP | 3 | 0.69% | |
| 9 | Sarveshwar Tripathi | IND | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 10 | Hari Shankar | BMP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 11 | Pradeep Pandey | AAP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 12 | Fakhruddin S/o Swaleh | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 435 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 230 | 52.39% | 1 | 102 | Strong |
| BSP | 114 | 25.97% | 2 | 38 | Average |
| SP | 61 | 13.90% | 3 | 427 | Weak |
| INC | 12 | 2.73% | 4 | 38 | Poor |
| SDU | 4 | 0.91% | 6 | 101 | Poor |
| BEP | 4 | 0.91% | 5 | 36 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.68% | 7 | 44 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 3 | 0.68% | 8 | 188 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.46% | 9 | 286 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.23% | 11 | 164 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.23% | 10 | 225 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 304, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.