izk0fo0 ukfljxat PS 465
Naveen Alias Monu Dubey
SPSamajwadi Party177 votes at this polling station
over Radheshyam Pandey (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Naveen Alias Monu Dubey | SP | 177 | 44.03% | |
| 2 | Radheshyam Pandey | BSP | 106 | 26.37% | |
| 3 | Jai Pratap Singh | BJP | 89 | 22.14% | |
| 4 | Saimuhammad | AIMEI | 14 | 3.48% | |
| 5 | Kiran Shukla | INC | 5 | 1.24% | |
| 6 | Fakhruddin S/o Swaleh | IND | 4 | 1.00% | |
| 7 | Sarveshwar Tripathi | IND | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 8 | Hari Shankar | BMP | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 9 | Dinesh | BEP | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 10 | Pradeep Pandey | AAP | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 11 | Roonmati | ASP | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 12 | Shakuntala | SDU | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 402 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 177 | 43.81% | 1 | 106 | Strong |
| BSP | 106 | 26.24% | 2 | 46 | Average |
| BJP | 89 | 22.03% | 3 | 421 | Weak |
| AIMEI | 14 | 3.47% | 4 | 66 | Poor |
| IND | 6 | 1.49% | 5 | 90 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 1.24% | 6 | 252 | Poor |
| BMP | 2 | 0.50% | 7 | 149 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.25% | 8 | 318 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.25% | 9 | 268 | Poor |
| BEP | 1 | 0.25% | 10 | 332 | Poor |
| SDU | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 487 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 304, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.