izk0fo0ujdVgk f}rh;d{k PS 399
Naveen Alias Monu Dubey
SPSamajwadi Party216 votes at this polling station
over Jai Pratap Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Naveen Alias Monu Dubey | SP | 216 | 49.20% | |
| 2 | Jai Pratap Singh | BJP | 211 | 48.06% | |
| 3 | Saimuhammad | AIMEI | 4 | 0.91% | |
| 4 | Kiran Shukla | INC | 3 | 0.68% | |
| 5 | Radheshyam Pandey | BSP | 3 | 0.68% | |
| 6 | Fakhruddin S/o Swaleh | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 7 | Sarveshwar Tripathi | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 8 | Dinesh | BEP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Pradeep Pandey | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Roonmati | ASP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Shakuntala | SDU | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Hari Shankar | BMP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 439 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 216 | 49.09% | 1 | 55 | Strong |
| BJP | 211 | 47.95% | 2 | 142 | Strong |
| AIMEI | 4 | 0.91% | 3 | 176 | Poor |
| BSP | 3 | 0.68% | 4 | 455 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.68% | 5 | 352 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.45% | 6 | 349 | Poor |
| BEP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 469 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 458 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 470 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 446 | Poor |
| SDU | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 455 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 304, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.