iw0ek0fo0 fiijk iM+:iqj PS 275
Naveen Alias Monu Dubey
SPSamajwadi Party125 votes at this polling station
over Jai Pratap Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Naveen Alias Monu Dubey | SP | 125 | 68.68% | |
| 2 | Jai Pratap Singh | BJP | 27 | 14.84% | |
| 3 | Radheshyam Pandey | BSP | 15 | 8.24% | |
| 4 | Saimuhammad | AIMEI | 8 | 4.40% | |
| 5 | Kiran Shukla | INC | 3 | 1.65% | |
| 6 | Hari Shankar | BMP | 1 | 0.55% | |
| 7 | Pradeep Pandey | AAP | 1 | 0.55% | |
| 8 | Shakuntala | SDU | 1 | 0.55% | |
| 9 | Sarveshwar Tripathi | IND | 1 | 0.55% | |
| 10 | Roonmati | ASP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Fakhruddin S/o Swaleh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Dinesh | BEP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 182 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 125 | 68.68% | 1 | 248 | Strong |
| BJP | 27 | 14.84% | 2 | 486 | Weak |
| BSP | 15 | 8.24% | 3 | 349 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 8 | 4.40% | 4 | 100 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 1.65% | 5 | 336 | Poor |
| SDU | 1 | 0.55% | 9 | 238 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.55% | 7 | 231 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.55% | 6 | 270 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.55% | 8 | 406 | Poor |
| BEP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 418 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 381 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 304, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.