izk0fo0 e>ou[kqnZ PS 23
Jai Pratap Singh
BJPBharatiya Janata Party209 votes at this polling station
over Radheshyam Pandey (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jai Pratap Singh | BJP | 209 | 46.04% | |
| 2 | Radheshyam Pandey | BSP | 145 | 31.94% | |
| 3 | Naveen Alias Monu Dubey | SP | 85 | 18.72% | |
| 4 | Kiran Shukla | INC | 5 | 1.10% | |
| 5 | Roonmati | ASP | 4 | 0.88% | |
| 6 | Dinesh | BEP | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 7 | Pradeep Pandey | AAP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 8 | Shakuntala | SDU | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 9 | Saimuhammad | AIMEI | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 10 | Sarveshwar Tripathi | IND | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 11 | Hari Shankar | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Fakhruddin S/o Swaleh | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 454 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 209 | 45.83% | 1 | 146 | Strong |
| BSP | 145 | 31.80% | 2 | 18 | Average |
| SP | 85 | 18.64% | 3 | 363 | Weak |
| INC | 5 | 1.10% | 4 | 206 | Poor |
| ASP | 4 | 0.88% | 5 | 24 | Poor |
| BEP | 2 | 0.44% | 6 | 112 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 1 | 0.22% | 8 | 293 | Poor |
| SDU | 1 | 0.22% | 10 | 176 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.22% | 9 | 374 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.22% | 7 | 218 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 303 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 304, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.