nh0c0b0dk0unko PS 213
Radheshyam Pandey
BSPBahujan Samaj Party169 votes at this polling station
over Naveen Alias Monu Dubey (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Radheshyam Pandey | BSP | 169 | 42.25% | |
| 2 | Naveen Alias Monu Dubey | SP | 128 | 32.00% | |
| 3 | Jai Pratap Singh | BJP | 91 | 22.75% | |
| 4 | Kiran Shukla | INC | 3 | 0.75% | |
| 5 | Dinesh | BEP | 3 | 0.75% | |
| 6 | Saimuhammad | AIMEI | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 7 | Hari Shankar | BMP | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 8 | Fakhruddin S/o Swaleh | IND | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 9 | Roonmati | ASP | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 10 | Shakuntala | SDU | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 11 | Sarveshwar Tripathi | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Pradeep Pandey | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 400 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 169 | 42.25% | 1 | 9 | Strong |
| SP | 128 | 32.00% | 2 | 238 | Average |
| BJP | 91 | 22.75% | 3 | 416 | Weak |
| BEP | 3 | 0.75% | 4 | 79 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.75% | 5 | 330 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 2 | 0.50% | 6 | 256 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.25% | 8 | 210 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.25% | 7 | 204 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.25% | 9 | 398 | Poor |
| SDU | 1 | 0.25% | 10 | 220 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 395 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 304, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.