izk0fo0 egqbZukudkj PS 167
Jai Pratap Singh
BJPBharatiya Janata Party158 votes at this polling station
over Radheshyam Pandey (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jai Pratap Singh | BJP | 158 | 56.63% | |
| 2 | Radheshyam Pandey | BSP | 52 | 18.64% | |
| 3 | Naveen Alias Monu Dubey | SP | 49 | 17.56% | |
| 4 | Saimuhammad | AIMEI | 7 | 2.51% | |
| 5 | Kiran Shukla | INC | 7 | 2.51% | |
| 6 | Pradeep Pandey | AAP | 3 | 1.08% | |
| 7 | Roonmati | ASP | 1 | 0.36% | |
| 8 | Dinesh | BEP | 1 | 0.36% | |
| 9 | Fakhruddin S/o Swaleh | IND | 1 | 0.36% | |
| 10 | Sarveshwar Tripathi | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Shakuntala | SDU | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Hari Shankar | BMP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 279 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 158 | 56.43% | 1 | 263 | Strong |
| BSP | 52 | 18.57% | 2 | 166 | Weak |
| SP | 49 | 17.50% | 3 | 448 | Weak |
| INC | 7 | 2.50% | 5 | 139 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 7 | 2.50% | 4 | 112 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 1.07% | 6 | 120 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.36% | 7 | 188 | Poor |
| BEP | 1 | 0.36% | 8 | 250 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.36% | 9 | 392 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 360 | Poor |
| SDU | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 347 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 304, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.