izk0fo0 egqbZukudkj PS 166
Naveen Alias Monu Dubey
SPSamajwadi Party127 votes at this polling station
over Radheshyam Pandey (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Naveen Alias Monu Dubey | SP | 127 | 43.64% | |
| 2 | Radheshyam Pandey | BSP | 87 | 29.90% | |
| 3 | Jai Pratap Singh | BJP | 63 | 21.65% | |
| 4 | Shakuntala | SDU | 5 | 1.72% | |
| 5 | Kiran Shukla | INC | 3 | 1.03% | |
| 6 | Dinesh | BEP | 2 | 0.69% | |
| 7 | Pradeep Pandey | AAP | 1 | 0.34% | |
| 8 | Saimuhammad | AIMEI | 1 | 0.34% | |
| 9 | Hari Shankar | BMP | 1 | 0.34% | |
| 10 | Sarveshwar Tripathi | IND | 1 | 0.34% | |
| 11 | Fakhruddin S/o Swaleh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Roonmati | ASP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 291 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 127 | 43.20% | 1 | 241 | Strong |
| BSP | 87 | 29.59% | 2 | 73 | Average |
| BJP | 63 | 21.43% | 3 | 454 | Weak |
| SDU | 5 | 1.70% | 4 | 93 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 1.02% | 5 | 324 | Poor |
| BEP | 2 | 0.68% | 6 | 140 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.34% | 10 | 391 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.34% | 7 | 244 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 1 | 0.34% | 8 | 325 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.34% | 9 | 194 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 333 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 304, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.