izk0fo0 rkjk xqtjkSfy;k PS 101
Radheshyam Pandey
BSPBahujan Samaj Party148 votes at this polling station
over Jai Pratap Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Radheshyam Pandey | BSP | 148 | 62.98% | |
| 2 | Jai Pratap Singh | BJP | 41 | 17.45% | |
| 3 | Naveen Alias Monu Dubey | SP | 28 | 11.91% | |
| 4 | Shakuntala | SDU | 10 | 4.26% | |
| 5 | Dinesh | BEP | 2 | 0.85% | |
| 6 | Kiran Shukla | INC | 2 | 0.85% | |
| 7 | Sarveshwar Tripathi | IND | 2 | 0.85% | |
| 8 | Pradeep Pandey | AAP | 1 | 0.43% | |
| 9 | Saimuhammad | AIMEI | 1 | 0.43% | |
| 10 | Hari Shankar | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Fakhruddin S/o Swaleh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Roonmati | ASP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 235 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 148 | 62.98% | 1 | 16 | Strong |
| BJP | 41 | 17.45% | 2 | 470 | Weak |
| SP | 28 | 11.91% | 3 | 480 | Weak |
| SDU | 10 | 4.26% | 4 | 65 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.85% | 6 | 294 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.85% | 7 | 381 | Poor |
| BEP | 2 | 0.85% | 5 | 124 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.43% | 8 | 236 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 1 | 0.43% | 9 | 308 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 336 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 314 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 304, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.