प्रा०वि० कठेला शर्की PS 451
Vinay Verma
ADSApna Dal (Soneylal)227 votes at this polling station
over Prem Chandra (SBSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vinay Verma | ADS | 227 | 42.51% | |
| 2 | Prem Chandra | SBSP | 169 | 31.65% | |
| 3 | Radharaman Tripathi | BSP | 48 | 8.99% | |
| 4 | Amar Singh Chaudhari | ASPKR | 29 | 5.43% | |
| 5 | Dr. Mohd. Sarfaraz Ansari | IND | 17 | 3.18% | |
| 6 | Vidhyanand alias Vidyanand | BMP | 9 | 1.69% | |
| 7 | Omprakash | JDU | 7 | 1.31% | |
| 8 | NOTA | NOTA | 7 | 1.31% | |
| 9 | Chaudhari Ravindra Pratap | INC | 7 | 1.31% | |
| 10 | Baxi Sharad Kumar Srivastav | AAP | 7 | 1.31% | |
| 11 | Jilajit | NJP | 3 | 0.56% | |
| 12 | Shiv Sagar | IND | 3 | 0.56% | |
| 13 | Divakar Vikram Singh | IND | 1 | 0.19% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 534 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADS | 227 | 42.51% | 1 | 4 | Strong |
| SBSP | 169 | 31.65% | 2 | 10 | Average |
| BSP | 48 | 8.99% | 3 | 16 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 29 | 5.43% | 4 | 16 | Poor |
| IND | 21 | 3.93% | 5 | 10 | Poor |
| BMP | 9 | 1.69% | 6 | 5 | Poor |
| AAP | 7 | 1.31% | 7 | 7 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 1.31% | 8 | 43 | Poor |
| JDU | 7 | 1.31% | 9 | 8 | Poor |
| NOTA | 7 | 1.31% | 10 | 9 | Poor |
| NJP | 3 | 0.56% | 11 | 14 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 302, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.