प्रा0वि० डबरा PS 411
Vinay Verma
ADSApna Dal (Soneylal)162 votes at this polling station
over Prem Chandra (SBSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vinay Verma | ADS | 162 | 39.04% | |
| 2 | Prem Chandra | SBSP | 133 | 32.05% | |
| 3 | Amar Singh Chaudhari | ASPKR | 50 | 12.05% | |
| 4 | Radharaman Tripathi | BSP | 25 | 6.02% | |
| 5 | Chaudhari Ravindra Pratap | INC | 17 | 4.10% | |
| 6 | Vidhyanand alias Vidyanand | BMP | 8 | 1.93% | |
| 7 | Baxi Sharad Kumar Srivastav | AAP | 5 | 1.20% | |
| 8 | Omprakash | JDU | 4 | 0.96% | |
| 9 | NOTA | NOTA | 4 | 0.96% | |
| 10 | Jilajit | NJP | 3 | 0.72% | |
| 11 | Dr. Mohd. Sarfaraz Ansari | IND | 2 | 0.48% | |
| 12 | Divakar Vikram Singh | IND | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 13 | Shiv Sagar | IND | 1 | 0.24% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 415 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADS | 162 | 39.04% | 1 | 18 | Average |
| SBSP | 133 | 32.05% | 2 | 15 | Average |
| ASPKR | 50 | 12.05% | 3 | 9 | Weak |
| BSP | 25 | 6.02% | 4 | 30 | Poor |
| INC | 17 | 4.10% | 5 | 30 | Poor |
| BMP | 8 | 1.93% | 6 | 6 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 1.20% | 7 | 14 | Poor |
| JDU | 4 | 0.96% | 9 | 17 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.96% | 8 | 45 | Poor |
| NOTA | 4 | 0.96% | 10 | 22 | Poor |
| NJP | 3 | 0.72% | 11 | 13 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 302, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.