प्रा0वि० सिरवत PS 391
Vinay Verma
ADSApna Dal (Soneylal)201 votes at this polling station
over Prem Chandra (SBSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vinay Verma | ADS | 201 | 37.92% | |
| 2 | Prem Chandra | SBSP | 109 | 20.57% | |
| 3 | Chaudhari Ravindra Pratap | INC | 80 | 15.09% | |
| 4 | Radharaman Tripathi | BSP | 76 | 14.34% | |
| 5 | Amar Singh Chaudhari | ASPKR | 28 | 5.28% | |
| 6 | Dr. Mohd. Sarfaraz Ansari | IND | 11 | 2.08% | |
| 7 | Divakar Vikram Singh | IND | 7 | 1.32% | |
| 8 | Jilajit | NJP | 6 | 1.13% | |
| 9 | Shiv Sagar | IND | 3 | 0.57% | |
| 10 | NOTA | NOTA | 3 | 0.57% | |
| 11 | Vidhyanand alias Vidyanand | BMP | 3 | 0.57% | |
| 12 | Omprakash | JDU | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 13 | Baxi Sharad Kumar Srivastav | AAP | 1 | 0.19% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 530 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADS | 201 | 37.92% | 1 | 11 | Average |
| SBSP | 109 | 20.57% | 2 | 19 | Weak |
| INC | 80 | 15.09% | 3 | 10 | Weak |
| BSP | 76 | 14.34% | 4 | 13 | Weak |
| ASPKR | 28 | 5.28% | 5 | 18 | Poor |
| IND | 21 | 3.96% | 6 | 9 | Poor |
| NJP | 6 | 1.13% | 7 | 4 | Poor |
| NOTA | 3 | 0.57% | 9 | 29 | Poor |
| BMP | 3 | 0.57% | 8 | 30 | Poor |
| JDU | 2 | 0.38% | 10 | 32 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.19% | 11 | 43 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 302, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.