पं0भ० भदॉव PS 241
Vinay Verma
ADSApna Dal (Soneylal)122 votes at this polling station
over Chaudhari Ravindra Pratap (INC)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vinay Verma | ADS | 122 | 59.22% | |
| 2 | Chaudhari Ravindra Pratap | INC | 31 | 15.05% | |
| 3 | Amar Singh Chaudhari | ASPKR | 25 | 12.14% | |
| 4 | Prem Chandra | SBSP | 11 | 5.34% | |
| 5 | Baxi Sharad Kumar Srivastav | AAP | 7 | 3.40% | |
| 6 | Divakar Vikram Singh | IND | 4 | 1.94% | |
| 7 | Shiv Sagar | IND | 1 | 0.49% | |
| 8 | Dr. Mohd. Sarfaraz Ansari | IND | 1 | 0.49% | |
| 9 | NOTA | NOTA | 1 | 0.49% | |
| 10 | Omprakash | JDU | 1 | 0.49% | |
| 11 | Radharaman Tripathi | BSP | 1 | 0.49% | |
| 12 | Vidhyanand alias Vidyanand | BMP | 1 | 0.49% | |
| 13 | Jilajit | NJP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 206 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADS | 122 | 59.22% | 1 | 29 | Strong |
| INC | 31 | 15.05% | 2 | 22 | Weak |
| ASPKR | 25 | 12.14% | 3 | 21 | Weak |
| SBSP | 11 | 5.34% | 4 | 46 | Poor |
| AAP | 7 | 3.40% | 5 | 5 | Poor |
| IND | 6 | 2.91% | 6 | 40 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.49% | 10 | 44 | Poor |
| JDU | 1 | 0.49% | 9 | 38 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.49% | 7 | 38 | Poor |
| BSP | 1 | 0.49% | 8 | 46 | Poor |
| NJP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 39 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 302, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.