PARIMARI PATHSALA] SITARAMPUR GRANT PS 11
Prabhat Kumar Verma
BJPBJP301 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Singh (INC)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Prabhat Kumar Verma | BJP | 301 | 62.32% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Singh | INC | 96 | 19.88% | |
| 3 | Sanjay Kumar | SP | 61 | 12.63% | |
| 4 | Nigar Fatma | BSP | 12 | 2.48% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 3 | 0.62% | |
| 6 | Vijay Prakash | SS | 3 | 0.62% | |
| 7 | Ram Vilas | JAP | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 8 | Shiv Kumar | IND | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 9 | Shiv Baran | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 10 | Sanjay Kumar Pathak | AAP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 11 | Pramod Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 12 | Shyam Narayan | JDL | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 483 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 301 | 62.32% | 1 | 38 | Strong |
| INC | 96 | 19.88% | 2 | 119 | Weak |
| SP | 61 | 12.63% | 3 | 312 | Weak |
| BSP | 12 | 2.48% | 4 | 246 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.83% | 5 | 228 | Poor |
| NOTA | 3 | 0.62% | 6 | 153 | Poor |
| SS | 3 | 0.62% | 7 | 34 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.41% | 8 | 145 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.21% | 9 | 97 | Poor |
| JDL | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 191 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 301, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.