PRIMARY PATHSHALA RUPAIDEEH PS 417
2- PRATEEK BHUSHAN SINGH
BJPBJP266 votes at this polling station
over 4- SURAJ SINGH (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2- PRATEEK BHUSHAN SINGH | BJP | 266 | 50.38% | |
| 2 | 4- SURAJ SINGH | SP | 219 | 41.48% | |
| 3 | 1- MOHD. ZAKI | BSP | 24 | 4.55% | |
| 4 | 3- RAMA KASHYAP | INC | 5 | 0.95% | |
| 5 | 13- SURAJ SINGH | IND | 3 | 0.57% | |
| 6 | 15- SANJAY KUMAR | IND | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 7 | 5- AJAY KUMAR PRABHAKAR | AAP | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 8 | 7- JAMAL AHMAD | RS | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 9 | 8-SANTOSH KUMAR | NP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 10 | 9- KANHAIYA LAL | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 11 | 10- RAZIA BANO | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 12 | 11- RAM BHAWAN | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 13 | 12- SUNDARI PANDEY | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 14 | 6-KALPRAM | LR | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | 14- SURYA MANI | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 528 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 266 | 50.28% | 1 | 148 | Strong |
| SP | 219 | 41.40% | 2 | 171 | Strong |
| BSP | 24 | 4.54% | 3 | 52 | Poor |
| IND | 9 | 1.70% | 4 | 141 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 0.95% | 5 | 255 | Poor |
| RS | 2 | 0.38% | 7 | 55 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.38% | 6 | 168 | Poor |
| NP | 1 | 0.19% | 8 | 204 | Poor |
| LR | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 419 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 296, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.