PRIMARY PATHSHALA FIROJPUR PS 409
4- SURAJ SINGH
SPSP381 votes at this polling station
over 2- PRATEEK BHUSHAN SINGH (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4- SURAJ SINGH | SP | 381 | 64.91% | |
| 2 | 2- PRATEEK BHUSHAN SINGH | BJP | 149 | 25.38% | |
| 3 | 1- MOHD. ZAKI | BSP | 23 | 3.92% | |
| 4 | 3- RAMA KASHYAP | INC | 16 | 2.73% | |
| 5 | 8-SANTOSH KUMAR | NP | 4 | 0.68% | |
| 6 | 15- SANJAY KUMAR | IND | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 7 | 13- SURAJ SINGH | IND | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 8 | 10- RAZIA BANO | IND | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 9 | 5- AJAY KUMAR PRABHAKAR | AAP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 10 | 6-KALPRAM | LR | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | 7- JAMAL AHMAD | RS | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 12 | 9- KANHAIYA LAL | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 13 | 12- SUNDARI PANDEY | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 14 | 14- SURYA MANI | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 15 | 11- RAM BHAWAN | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 587 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 381 | 64.80% | 1 | 25 | Strong |
| BJP | 149 | 25.34% | 2 | 322 | Average |
| BSP | 23 | 3.91% | 3 | 54 | Poor |
| INC | 16 | 2.72% | 4 | 15 | Poor |
| IND | 10 | 1.70% | 5 | 118 | Poor |
| NP | 4 | 0.68% | 6 | 14 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.34% | 7 | 167 | Poor |
| RS | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 161 | Poor |
| LR | 1 | 0.17% | 8 | 127 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 296, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.